Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Dimir Midrange | arianne | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-1 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 6-3 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 6-3 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | kroma_ | 6-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Omniscience , Azorius Auras , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash , Azorius Synthesizer , Azorius Tempo , Bant Tempo , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons
Meta Performance Analysis
Phantom Interference ranks #83 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 20%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 72.0%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Phantom Interference is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 30.46 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.0%. Phantom Interference has a win rate of 69.2%, making it 8.9% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faerie Dreamthief | Creature — Faerie Warlock | 66 | 67.0% | 10 |
| Qarsi Revenant | Creature — Vampire | 6 | 66.3% | 1 |
| Intimidation Tactics | Sorcery | 6 | 63.2% | 1 |
| Quick Study | Instant | 22 | 63.1% | 6 |
| Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 29 | 62.6% | 5 |
| Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 31 | 61.8% | 15 |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 8 | 61.8% | 2 |
| Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 18 | 61.1% | 5 |
| Unholy Annex/Ritual Chamber | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 32 | 61.0% | 6 |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 221 | 60.5% | 45 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Phantom Interference than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faerie Dreamthief | Creature — Faerie Warlock | 1 | 21 | 73.1% | 71.1% | +2.0% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 42 | 71.7% | 71.4% | +0.3% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 27 | 72.1% | 72.1% | +0.1% |
| Intimidation Tactics | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 67.6% | 67.6% | +0.0% |
| Ertai Resurrected | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Human Wizard | 4 | 39 | 68.7% | 69.4% | -0.7% |
| Deep-Cavern Bat | Creature — Bat | 2 | 49 | 69.0% | 69.9% | -0.8% |
| Malicious Eclipse | Sorcery | 3 | 31 | 69.5% | 70.5% | -1.0% |
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 50 | 69.4% | 70.5% | -1.2% |
| Enduring Curiosity | Enchantment Creature — Cat Glimmer | 4 | 49 | 69.0% | 70.6% | -1.5% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 50 | 69.1% | 70.9% | -1.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 858 | 41.4% | 54.6% |
| Azorius Tempo | 109 | 27.4% | 30.6% |
| Dimir Bounce | 95 | 19.2% | 52.2% |
| Dimir Demons | 65 | 64.4% | 58.4% |
| Unclassified | 7 | 3.5% | 24.1% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.